Your engineers adopted AI coding tools first. Now the bill is here.
Technology companies were first to put coding agents in every engineer's hands, and usage-based pricing means the cost scales with that enthusiasm. We make the routine work cheap so the tools stay.
The challenge
What makes software, platforms, and marketplaces different.
01
Usage grows faster than headcount
Agents run longer sessions and read more code every quarter. Spend follows.
02
Several tools at once
Claude Code, Cursor, and Copilot often coexist. Routing has to cover all of them.
03
Nobody wants to slow down
Any cost measure that makes engineers wait or switch tools won't survive a sprint.
Where the tokens go
Work we route to cheap models.
- Monorepo search and navigation
- Reading large files for context
- Test generation
- Types, schemas, and config
- Dependency upgrades
- Code review preparation
Tools we route
Routing runs inside your environment — your cloud account, your data center, or an isolated network.
- No change to engineers' editors or workflows
- Routing rules your platform team can own
- Per-team cost visibility
- A log of which model produced every routed change
Recommended path
How engagements typically unfold.
Start where the value is clearest. Most clients begin with a spend audit, then route one team before rolling out.
Start the conversation
Stop paying frontier prices for routine work.
Tell us which coding tools your engineers use and roughly what you spend. We'll show you where the tokens go and what routing would change.
We respond within 1 business day. Mutual NDA available before any data discussion.